• Mohon salin/tempel pesan error yang Anda lihat di layar, jika ada.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Mohon jelaskan apa yang ingin Anda lakukan, apa yang kemudian Anda lakukan, dan apa yang terjadi

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Harap salin/tempel teks yang ditampilkan dalam bahasa Inggris alih-alih bahasa anda. Jika Anda memiliki screenshot bug ini (disarankan), Anda dapat menggunakan Imgur.com untuk menguploadnya dan memberi tautannya di sini.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• apakah teks ini tersedia dalam translation system? jika iya, itu bisa diartikan lebih dari 24 jam

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Tolong jelaskan saran Anda secara tepat dan ringkas sehingga semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang Anda maksud.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Apa yang tampil di layar ketika Anda tidak dapat berjalan (Layar kosong? Hanya tampil sebagian antar-muka? Pesan error?)

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Bagian mana dari peraturan yang tidak diterapkan dengan tepat oleh BGA

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apakah kesalahan peraturan dapat dilihat dari ulangan permainan? Jika ya, pada langkah ke berapa?

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Aksi permainan apa yang ingin Anda lakukan?

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa yang Anda coba lakukan untuk memunculkan aksi permainan ini?

• Apa yang terjadi ketika Anda melakukannya (pesan error, pesan status permainan, ...)?

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Pada langkah ke berapa masalah tersebut muncul (apa petunjuk permainan saat itu)?

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa yang terjadi ketika Anda mencoba untuk melakukan aksi permainan (pesan error, pesan status permainan, ...)?

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Mohon jelaskan masalah tampilannya. Jika Anda memiliki screenshot bug ini (disarankan), Anda dapat menggunakan Imgur.com untuk menguploadnya dan memberi tautannya di sini.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Harap salin/tempel teks yang ditampilkan dalam bahasa Inggris alih-alih bahasa anda. Jika Anda memiliki screenshot bug ini (disarankan), Anda dapat menggunakan Imgur.com untuk menguploadnya dan memberi tautannya di sini.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• apakah teks ini tersedia dalam translation system? jika iya, itu bisa diartikan lebih dari 24 jam

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?

• Tolong jelaskan saran Anda secara tepat dan ringkas sehingga semudah mungkin untuk memahami apa yang Anda maksud.

When you have clearly lost a tournament match, you are forced to play out the rest of the game. There are two justifications for this:

1. The winner might get more than 1 point.
2. The winner wants the experience of playing out their win in full.

In the case of certain games like Chess, where you can score at most 1 point, the first point doesn't apply.

In the case of Chess, there can't be very many people for whom the second point applies. It can be frustrating to have to play a Chess match to conclusion for both the winner and the loser, to the point where some would consider it rude not to resign.

However, even for games where it is fun to play out your win, I believe it is not worth the frustration experienced by the loser, and to force the loser to play til they are beaten into the dirt is quite a selfish way to approach board-gaming.

As such, it should be possible to concede tournament matches wherever a win would only grant 1 point.

• Apa browser yang Anda gunakan?