Laporan • Board Game Arena

Semua laporan

Laporan Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

notabug: Ini bukan bug

Tentang apa laporan ini?

Mapmaker: The Gerrymandering Game #129404798

Apa yang terjadi? Pilih di bawah

Peraturan: ada peraturan permainan yang tidak diterapkan dengan tepat

Apa yang terjadi? Pilih di bawah

Peraturan: ada peraturan permainan yang tidak diterapkan dengan tepat

Silakan periksa apakah sudah ada laporan tentang hal yang sama

Jika ya, silakan VOTE untuk laporan ini. Laporan dengan suara terbanyak diberikan PRIORITAS!

#	Status	Votes	Game	Type	Title	Last update

Detil Deskripsi

Laporkan riwayat

7 Dec 2020 04:01 • TheRandy • Bug belum direka-ulang oleh pihak pengembang:

The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner.
We both had 4 districts.
We both controlled 1 swing county.
The game assigned the victory to the other payer:
(blue) Forevergm 4 (2)
(red) TheRandy 4 (1)

The output message was: "Number of swing counties won"-
there are only 2 swing counties in the game.

Looking at the rules: "On the rare occasion that there’s still a tie, go to the Supreme Court. Whichever tied player has the fewest total votes for their own party within their own districts wins." My count was: (it might be off a point of 2): 78 blue - 63 red.

7 Dec 2020 04:21 • gkz • Ini bukan bug:

In an `n` player game, there should be `n + 1` swing counties: the `n` 1 tokens for each color and the neutral 0 token.

In this particular game, the blue player won the red 1 and the blue 1 (looks like the red 1 was underneath a meeple). The red player won the neutral 0. Thus the game counted the swing counties correctly.

---

Note that with 2 players, it should be impossible to go to the Supreme Court (since the tie break is majority of the 3 swing counties). With more players, it's possible to have a tie in swing counties. However, in such a case, the game won't actually fall back to this Supreme Court rule, since that was never implemented :). It'll just say that both players ended up winning. I'm also not sure if BGA's framework will allow for multiple tiebreak conditions (just based on the structure of the config), but I could look into it if it becomes a problem.

23 Dec 2020 18:46 • Scott_wmu • Ini bukan bug:

Per the notes above, it looked like the second tiebreaker was never coded (“Supreme Court”). We played a 4 player where is showed a shared victory even though Yellow was the victor per the rules (57 < 65 votes for own in own districts).

boardgamearena.com/table?table=132155273

Just pointing out an occurrence - not sure how often it happens.

23 Dec 2020 19:35 • gkz • Ini bukan bug:

Thanks for the note! Could you actually open a suggestion bug about implementing supreme court? I don't think it'll happen that often, but would be better to track separately from this.

Tambahkan hal lain di laporan ini

Silakan tambahkan di sini segala sesuatu yang tampaknya relevan untuk mereproduksi bug ini atau memahami saran Anda:

ID meja / nomor langkah lainnya
Apakah F5 menyelesaikan masalah?
Apakah masalah tersebut telah muncul beberapa kali? Setiap kali? Tidak tentu?
Jika Anda memiliki screenshot bug ini (disarankan), Anda dapat menggunakan Imgur.com untuk menguploadnya dan memberi tautannya di sini.

Batal Perbarui laporan

#29558: "The tie breaker calculated the wrong winner."

Tentang apa laporan ini?

Apa yang terjadi? Pilih di bawah

Apa yang terjadi? Pilih di bawah

Silakan periksa apakah sudah ada laporan tentang hal yang sama

Detil Deskripsi

Laporkan riwayat

Tambahkan hal lain di laporan ini

Ubah status laporan ke:

Bantuan

Kontribusi

Navigasi

Ikuti kami